Tuesday, June 23, 2009

How To Install Onyx On Walls

The parliamentary inquiry into the management Soplao was rejected in Parliament by regional and social groups

In the last sitting of 2008/09, Marcano not show its face and neither the regional nor the Socialists give support and summons him.


A week ago, the Minister of Culture, Tourism and Sport, was questioned by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the House Cantabrian about irregularities in procurement, management and operation of tourist attraction Soplao.
In a sitting tight and loaded, Marcano shouted to believe that the charges for which he is charged and has released World Cantabria, are "totally false."

Similarly, the Popular Party, through its deputy Tamara Gonzalez, a counselor had "papers" in the accounts given of the irregularities of which he and a receiver part of the Municipality of Torrelavega while he was mayor Marcano . These irregularities in the procurement of various services in the departments of festivities and finance.
In this House, is expected to clear and conclusive answers about the facts, if true, show the corruption that has engulfed the socialist regional government of Mr. Revilla and his henchmen.

But joy fell into the well. "Why not has left the Government to defend their honor? Did few charges? ". Thus, in his opening statement, the spokesman of the Popular Group, Francisco Rodríguez Argüeso, began reflecting on the performance of regional government to silence accusations of supine gravity, which, undermine the reputation of the Government of Cantabria.

In it, Rodriguez again asked Argüeso the "ledger" for the management of the Soplao. Given the refusal and proven and it portends for the vote, there is a little or rather no government transparency regarding the management of the Soplao and concessions.
Reminding the director of irregularities during his time as mayor in the city of Torrelavega, appeals to the right of Cantabria to have "clarity of what happens."

intervention in the Socialist parliamentary group, his deputy, Cristina Perez, decides not to mention the accusations of the summons and uses the technique of "YOU MORE" to silence the questioning of popular.

socialist MEP He explained, "The Socialist Party believes in the rule of law, which means you believe in justice." Thus, referring to the accusations on Senator's Party for Cantabria Luis Barcenas.

socialist lawmaker, meanwhile, also used his speech to accuse the Popular Party of Cantabria to manipulate the media. "Referring to the World Cantabria.

To the surprise of some, was not the director who gave the face on behalf of regional groups, but he did his spokesman Rafael de la Sierra. How could it be otherwise, and like its predecessor in the order of answers, the regional deputy used his speech to accuse the Popular Party of wanting to "monetize and create social unrest."

"We are not willing to be manipulated by the Popular Party for such petty matters" is embarrassing. Handling unacceptable ".- advocated regionalism.
De la Sierra maintains that the payments relating to the period of government in the city of Torrelavega while he was mayor Marcano are correct and that the culprit, if any, would be the finance council which is what is known about the irregularidades.Como they say, "blame pa'l empedrao."
was saying goodbye in a threatening tone that "we will reject the motion."

As the Popular Party came to the rostrum, the chicken was already mounted. Screams, laughter, but in the air flying knives.
His first words were used to accuse De la Sierra, with a bill in hand in which it is shown that is signed by Marcano, lying to the whole Cantabrian society.

chides Marcano to "define himself" because he is charged and if Mr. Barcenas not.

And he is right when he says the popular deputy that "no government official puts his hand on fire by the counselor."
To end your turn, predicts and wonders why they are voting not to come to parliament ledgers. In turn, accused the counselor of his use of public funds and the relationship with some media in the region.
Finally, the motion was rejected with 17 votes to 20 in against.
Now we just wait for the response of the courts. Blog

0 comments:

Post a Comment